Join the Oncology
Community
Follow Us:  

Treatment-Related Side Effects

The Optimal Dose Fractionation Schema for Malignant Extradural Spinal Cord Compression

07/02/11

Bookmark and Share


Submitting your vote...
Not rated yet. Be the first who rates this item!
Click the rating bar to rate this item.

The Journal of Supportive Oncology
Volume 9, Issue 4, July-August 2011, Pages 121-124


doi:10.1016/j.suponc.2011.04.004 

  Permissions & Reprints

Review

The Optimal Dose Fractionation Schema for Malignant Extradural Spinal Cord Compression

D. Andrew Loblaw BSc, MD, MSc, FRCPC, CIPCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Gunita Mitera Bsc, MRT(T), MBA, PhD(c)


 

Received 13 December 2010; 

accepted 7 April 2011. 

Available online 2 July 2011.

 

 

Abstract

Malignant epidural spinal cord compression is a dreaded complication of malignancy. Fortunately, it does not happen very often. Estimating the prognosis is critical to achieving a balance between effective therapy and the burden of treatment. Treatment can be individualized by reviewing simple prognosis scales. For patients with a poor prognosis, a single fraction of 8 Gy is just as effective as multiple fractions and much more convenient. Surgery and radiation should be considered for patients with a more positive prognosis. For patients not getting surgery, enrollment in clinical trials of single vs. multiple fractions of radiation should be a priority.

 

 

Article Outline

Prognosis
Surgical Management of MESCC
Optimal Dose Fractionation Schedule

Poor-Prognosis Patients

Good-Prognosis Patients

Conclusions
References
Vitae

 

 

Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) is one of the most dreaded complications of metastatic cancer. MSCC can be divided into intradural (intramedullary and leptomeningeal) and extradural (Malignant Extradural Spinal Cord Compression [MESCC]).[1] Its natural history, if untreated, is usually one of relentless and progressive pain, paralysis, sensory loss, and sphincter dysfunction.[2]

A population-based study of cancer patients reported that 2.5% (n = 3,458) of all cancer patients who died from their disease between 1990 and 1995 had at least one admission for MSCC.[3] The incidence of MSCC varied widely by primary cancer site, from 7.9% in patients with myeloma to 0.2% in patients with pancreatic cancer.[3]

In 1998 and again in 2005, our group published evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of MESCC.[2] and [4]

> more Treatment-Related Side Effects articles




Current Issue


The Journal of Supportive Oncology Focused on symptom and side-effect management, communication issues, and end-of-life care for patients with cancer.



For past issues, click here »


calendar
Jun 1 - 5
Chicago, IL
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO): Annual Meeting
Jun 14 - 17
Amsterdam,
European Hematology Association (EHA): Annual Congress
Jun 18 - 21
Lake Tahoe, NV
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR): Pancreatic Cancer: Progress and Challenges
Jun 20 - 22
Milan,
European Institute of Oncology (IEO): 14th Milan Breast Cancer Conference
Jun 25 - 26
London,
Teenage Cancer Trust (TCT): International Conference
Jun 27 - 30
Barcelona,
European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Conference: World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer
Jun 27 - 30
Boston, MA
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR): Chemical Systems Biology
Jun 28 - 30
New York, NY
Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC)/ International Society of Oral Oncology (ISOO): International Symposium
Jun 28 - 29
Paris,
WIN 2012 Symposium
Jul 7 - 10
Barcelona,
22nd Biennial Congress of the European Association for Cancer Research
More Calendar »