Join the Oncology
Community
Follow Us:  

Reviews & Peer Viewpoints

Treatment of Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression: The Goldilocks Principle

The Journal of Supportive Oncology
Volume 9, Issue 4, July-August 2011, Pages 125-126


doi:10.1016/j.suponc.2011.04.005 | 

  Permissions & Reprints

 

Available online 2 July 2011.

 

Review

Treatment of Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression: The Goldilocks Principle

 

 

 

Joshua Jones MD, Erin McMenamin MSN, CRNP, Harry Quon MD, MS Corresponding Author Contact InformationE-mail The Corresponding Author

Commentary on “The Optimal Dose Fractionation Schema for Malignant Extradural Spinal Cord Compression" by D. Andrew Loblaw and Gunita Mitera (page 123).

 

 

 

 

Article Outline

References
Vitae

 

 

 

Loblaw and Mitera are to be congratulated for their ongoing efforts to provide systematic guidelines in the palliative management of patients with malignant spinal cord compressions (MSCC). Highlighted in this review are recent reports that can help determine an appropriate radiotherapy (RT) dose. Loblaw and Mitera explore the various considerations important to the multidisciplinary team when reviewing treatment options. As a result of a lack of significant progress in the management of MSCC, unanswered questions remain.

When a patient is given a poor prognosis, it is difficult to modulate treatment to alleviate the side effects of MSCC and the risk of toxicity and to improve quality of life. However, many symptoms arising from a tumor's mass require some measure of tumor response to therapy. Such is the case with the neurologic compromise that arises from MSCC.

Standard palliative RT doses alleviate the pain associated with MSCC. Reversing and maintaining ambulation can be limited and is likely dependent upon achieving sufficient tumor response to therapy. RT dose intensification may provide effective tumor response and disease control at the MSCC site, preventing future loss of neurologic function. However, there are major impediments for such studies: (1) the RT toxicities associated with the use of large traditional nonconformal RT fields often used to expedite care, (2) the time required (of the patient especially), and (3) the limited prognosis of the palliative patient.

07/02/11  

Bookmark and Share


Submitting your vote...
Not rated yet. Be the first who rates this item!
Click the rating bar to rate this item.



Current Issue


The Journal of Supportive Oncology Focused on symptom and side-effect management, communication issues, and end-of-life care for patients with cancer.



For past issues, click here »


calendar
Jun 1 - 5
Chicago, IL
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO): Annual Meeting
Jun 14 - 17
Amsterdam,
European Hematology Association (EHA): Annual Congress
Jun 18 - 21
Lake Tahoe, NV
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR): Pancreatic Cancer: Progress and Challenges
Jun 20 - 22
Milan,
European Institute of Oncology (IEO): 14th Milan Breast Cancer Conference
Jun 25 - 26
London,
Teenage Cancer Trust (TCT): International Conference
Jun 27 - 30
Barcelona,
European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Conference: World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer
Jun 27 - 30
Boston, MA
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR): Chemical Systems Biology
Jun 28 - 30
New York, NY
Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC)/ International Society of Oral Oncology (ISOO): International Symposium
Jun 28 - 29
Paris,
WIN 2012 Symposium
Jul 7 - 10
Barcelona,
22nd Biennial Congress of the European Association for Cancer Research
More Calendar »